211 Listings
480 CV fields

Find Directaerojobs on

AirAsia Crash Makes Stronger Case For Ejectable Black Boxes

A long-delayed proposal to outfit commercial airliners with ejectable flight data recorders may have a better chance of being adopted following the AirAsia crash in the Java Sea, according to people familiar with ICAO discussions.

The idea, which would equip commercial flights with data recorders that detach from the plane and float in water rather than sink, has bounced around ICAO committees for years and is back on the agenda at its High-Level Safety Conference in February, the first of its kind in five years.

ICAO wants to develop a global system to improve aircraft tracking and ensure accident sites are found quickly as part of its response to the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines MH370 last year.

"The time has come that deployable recorders are going to get a serious look," said an ICAO representative who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.

A second ICAO official familiar with the discussions said that public attention has galvanised momentum in favour of ejectable recorders on commercial aircraft.

"I think there's a more positive attitude now because of the last few accidents," he said in reference to AirAsia and an Air France flight that crashed in 2009 in the Atlantic. The Air France recorders weren't found until 2011.

Montreal-based ICAO, established in 1947, sets standards followed on most international flights, as the guidelines it develops typically become regulatory requirements in its 191 member states.

In 2012, ICAO's Flight Recorder Panel drafted a broad standard meant to make it easier to locate crash sites, including the use of ejectable recorders as one of several options, along with continuously tracking flights.

But according to recently released documents, ICAO's powerful Air Navigation Commission sent that standard back to the panel twice "for reconsideration," while it approved other changes, including longer battery life for conventional data recorders. ICAO did not comment on why the panel's drafts had been rejected.


Ejectable recorders were invented by the Canadian government's National Research Council in the 1960s and thousands are installed on fighter jets and small aircraft, such as helicopters.

Unlike military recorders which jettison away from a plane and float on water, signalling their location to search and rescue satellites, recorders on commercial flights sink. Underwater, they can only be detected over short distances.

Finmeccanica subsidiary DRS Technologies' director for air programmes Blake van den Heuvel said a detachable recorder costs about USD$30,000.

"This has been the pushback by (plane makers) and regulators - that deployables cost more," van den Heuvel said.

Modern commercial aircraft already have two fixed recorders. An ejectable recorder could be installed in the tail, replacing one. But the technology is untested on large, commercial aircraft because of cost concerns and the lack of political will to require them.

A spokesman for Honeywell International, one of the largest makers of black boxes, said the company doesn't manufacture ejectable recorders because it has not been required to do so by regulators or by its customers. Honeywell's widely used, non-ejectable recorders cost between USD$13,000 and USD$16,000 each.

Mike Poole, a former expert on flight recorders with the Transportation Safety Board of Canada, said transmitting data in real time would be a better solution.

"The current fixed recorders are highly reliable and cost effective and it is rare to not recover them," said Poole, who now heads an Ottawa-based aviation consulting company.

Asked about ejectable data recorders, IATA said: "There has not yet emerged an industry consensus on a mandate for ejectable flight data recorders."